Property: Has query

From Psalms: Layer by Layer
Jump to: navigation, search
previous 202050100250500next 20
Showing 20 pages using this property.
C
Circumstantial reading of yiqtol in the future ‘will not be able to stand’ +
Circumstantial reading of yiqtol in the future ‘will not be able to stand’  +, Circumstantial reading of yiqtol in the future ‘will not be able to stand’  +, Circumstantial reading of yiqtol in the future ‘will not be able to stand’  +, …
T
The hiphil verb concludes the first main section. +
The hiphil verb concludes the first main section.  +, The hiphil verb concludes the first main section.  +, The hiphil verb concludes the first main section.  +, …
מ
מִשׁפָּט refers to a specific judgment in the mind of the speaker. +
מִשׁפָּט refers to a specific judgment in the mind of the speaker.  +, מִשׁפָּט refers to a specific judgment in the mind of the speaker.  +, מִשׁפָּט refers to a specific judgment in the mind of the speaker.  +, …
T
There is a shift from agency to the passivity of the wicked. +
There is a shift from agency to the passivity of the wicked.  +, There is a shift from agency to the passivity of the wicked.  +, There is a shift from agency to the passivity of the wicked.  +, …
The Lord has an implicit role; his agency does not need to be explicit in order to be present. +
The Lord has an implicit role; his agency does not need to be explicit in order to be present.  +, The Lord has an implicit role; his agency does not need to be explicit in order to be present.  +, The Lord has an implicit role; his agency does not need to be explicit in order to be present.  +, …
כ
כִּי אִם (v.2a) is contrastive +
כִּי אִם (v.2a) is contrastive  +, כִּי אִם (v.2a) is contrastive  +, כִּי אִם (v.2a) is contrastive  +, …
כֵן refers back to the righteous who succeed at what they do. +
כֵן refers back to the righteous who succeed at what they do.  +, כֵן refers back to the righteous who succeed at what they do.  +, כֵן refers back to the righteous who succeed at what they do.  +, …
כִּי אִם is strongly disjunctive and introduces a consequent disparity between the prosperity of the godly (v.3) and the destiny of the wicked (v.4). +
כִּי אִם is strongly disjunctive and introduces a consequent disparity between the prosperity of the godly (v.3) and the destiny of the wicked (v.4).  +, כִּי אִם is strongly disjunctive and introduces a consequent disparity between the prosperity of the godly (v.3) and the destiny of the wicked (v.4).  +, כִּי אִם is strongly disjunctive and introduces a consequent disparity between the prosperity of the godly (v.3) and the destiny of the wicked (v.4).  +, …
ע
עַל-כֵּן indicates an explanation of the metaphors +
עַל-כֵּן indicates an explanation of the metaphors  +, עַל-כֵּן indicates an explanation of the metaphors  +, עַל-כֵּן indicates an explanation of the metaphors  +, …
עַל-כֵּן indicates a definitive conclusion based on the preceding v.4. +
עַל-כֵּן indicates a definitive conclusion based on the preceding v.4.  +, עַל-כֵּן indicates a definitive conclusion based on the preceding v.4.  +, עַל-כֵּן indicates a definitive conclusion based on the preceding v.4.  +, …
עַל-כֵּן refers back to the fact that the wicked’s destruction will be evident as well as the prosperity of the righteous. +
עַל-כֵּן refers back to the fact that the wicked’s destruction will be evident as well as the prosperity of the righteous.  +, עַל-כֵּן refers back to the fact that the wicked’s destruction will be evident as well as the prosperity of the righteous.  +, עַל-כֵּן refers back to the fact that the wicked’s destruction will be evident as well as the prosperity of the righteous.  +, …
כ
כִּי introduces the reason why the wicked will not be able to go to judgment with the righteous. +
כִּי introduces the reason why the wicked will not be able to go to judgment with the righteous.  +, כִּי introduces the reason why the wicked will not be able to go to judgment with the righteous.  +, כִּי introduces the reason why the wicked will not be able to go to judgment with the righteous.  +, …
כִּי has a discourse function asserting a final conclusion. +
כִּי has a discourse function asserting a final conclusion.  +, כִּי has a discourse function asserting a final conclusion.  +, כִּי has a discourse function asserting a final conclusion.  +, …
כִּי introduces a ground for the whole Psalm. +
כִּי introduces a ground for the whole Psalm.  +, כִּי introduces a ground for the whole Psalm.  +, כִּי introduces a ground for the whole Psalm.  +, …
G
God’s Torah is like the ground around the river that the tree is planted in +
God’s Torah is like the ground around the river that the tree is planted in  +, God’s Torah is like the ground around the river that the tree is planted in  +, God’s Torah is like the ground around the river that the tree is planted in  +, …
“
“Fruit” refers to prosperity in life +
“Fruit” refers to prosperity in life  +, “Fruit” refers to prosperity in life  +, “Fruit” refers to prosperity in life  +, …
C
Contrastive link between “not withering” (v.3) and “[dry] chaff” (v.4). +
Contrastive link between “not withering” (v.3) and “[dry] chaff” (v.4).  +, Contrastive link between “not withering” (v.3) and “[dry] chaff” (v.4).  +, Contrastive link between “not withering” (v.3) and “[dry] chaff” (v.4).  +, …
T
The agent of v.3d (וְכֹל אֲשֶׁר־יַעֲשֶׂה יַצְלִיחַ) may be either "the man" or "the tree" (semantic density). +
The agent of v.3d (וְכֹל אֲשֶׁר־יַעֲשֶׂה יַצְלִיחַ) may be either "the man" or "the tree" (semantic density).  +, The agent of v.3d (וְכֹל אֲשֶׁר־יַעֲשֶׂה יַצְלִיחַ) may be either "the man" or "the tree" (semantic density).  +, The agent of v.3d (וְכֹל אֲשֶׁר־יַעֲשֶׂה יַצְלִיחַ) may be either "the man" or "the tree" (semantic density).  +, …
The “steadiness” of the tree “שָׁת֪וּל” is contrasted with the helpless motion of the chaff. +
The “steadiness” of the tree “שָׁת֪וּל” is contrasted with the helpless motion of the chaff.  +, The “steadiness” of the tree “שָׁת֪וּל” is contrasted with the helpless motion of the chaff.  +, The “steadiness” of the tree “שָׁת֪וּל” is contrasted with the helpless motion of the chaff.  +, …
Tree vs. chaff is a comparison not only of permanence vs. impermanence, but (agricultural) usefulness vs. uselessness. +
Tree vs. chaff is a comparison not only of permanence vs. impermanence, but (agricultural) usefulness vs. uselessness.  +, Tree vs. chaff is a comparison not only of permanence vs. impermanence, but (agricultural) usefulness vs. uselessness.  +, Tree vs. chaff is a comparison not only of permanence vs. impermanence, but (agricultural) usefulness vs. uselessness.  +, …

Showing 10 related entities (more are available).

P
T