Psalm 119 Discourse

  Choose a Psalm  Navigate Psalm 119

Home

Listen & Read

Overview

Layers >>

Grammar & Semantics

Story Behind

Discourse

Poetry

Helps

Verse-by-Verse Notes

Exegetical Issues

Translation Aids

Book 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

Book 2

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

Book 3

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

Book 4

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

Book 5

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119

120

121

122

123

124

125

126

127

128

129

130

131

132

133

134

135

136

137

138

139

140

141

142

143

144

145

146

147

148

149

150

Walking the way of YHWH's word

Psalm 119

Please note: Resources for Psalm 119 are in the process of being reformatted for visual consistency and improved functionality.

About the Discourse Layer

Our Discourse Layer includes four additional layers of analysis:

• Participant analysis
• Macrosyntax
• Speech act analysis
• Emotional analysis

For more information on our method of analysis, click the expandable explanation button at the beginning of each layer.

• Participants
• Macrosyntax
• Speech Act
• Emotional Analysis

Participant Analysis

  What is Participant Analysis?

Participant Analysis focuses on the characters in the psalm and asks, “Who are the main participants (or characters) in this psalm, and what are they saying or doing? It is often helpful for understanding literary structure, speaker identification, etc.

For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Participant Analysis Creator Guidelines.

• Tracking Text
• Relations
• Distribution

Participant Relations Diagram

The relationships among the participants may be abstracted and summarized as follows:

Participant Analysis Summary Distribution

---

Macrosyntax

  What is Macrosyntax?

The macrosyntax layer rests on the belief that human communicators desire their addressees to receive a coherent picture of their message and will cooperatively provide clues to lead the addressee into a correct understanding. So, in the case of macrosyntax of the Psalms, the psalmist has explicitly left syntactic clues for the reader regarding the discourse structure of the entire psalm. Here we aim to account for the function of these elements, including the identification of conjunctions which either coordinate or subordinate entire clauses (as the analysis of coordinated individual phrases is carried out at the phrase-level semantics layer), vocatives, other discourse markers, direct speech, and clausal word order.

For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Macrosyntax Creator Guidelines.

Macrosyntax Diagram

  Legend

Macrosyntax legend
Vocatives	Vocatives are indicated by purple text.
Discourse marker	Discourse markers (such as כִּי, הִנֵּה, לָכֵן) are indicated by orange text.
	The scope governed by the discourse marker is indicated by a dashed orange bracket connecting the discourse marker to its scope.
	The preceding discourse grounding the discourse marker is indicated by a solid orange bracket encompassing the relevant clauses.
Subordinating conjunction	The subordinating conjunction is indicated by teal text.
	Subordination is indicated by a solid teal bracket connecting the subordinating conjunction with the clause to which it is subordinate.
Coordinating conjunction	The coordinating conjunction is indicated by blue text.
	Coordination is indicated by a solid blue line connecting the coordinating clauses.
	Coordination without an explicit conjunction is indicated by a dashed blue line connecting the coordinated clauses.
	Marked topic is indicated by a black dashed rounded rectangle around the marked words.
	The scope of the activated topic is indicated by a black dashed bracket encompassing the relevant clauses.
Marked focus or thetic sentence	Marked focus (if one constituent) or thetic sentences are indicated by bold text.
	Frame setters are indicated by a solid gray rounded rectangle around the marked words.
[blank line]	Discourse discontinuity is indicated by a blank line.
[indentation]	Syntactic subordination is indicated by indentation.
	Direct speech is indicated by a solid black rectangle surrounding all relevant clauses.
(text to elucidate the meaning of the macrosyntactic structures)	Within the CBC, any text elucidating the meaning of macrosyntax is indicated in gray text inside parentheses.

If an emendation or revocalization is preferred, that emendation or revocalization will be marked in the Hebrew text of all the visuals.

Emendations/Revocalizations legend
*Emended text*	Emended text, text in which the consonants differ from the consonants of the Masoretic text, is indicated by blue asterisks on either side of the emendation.
*Revocalized text*	Revocalized text, text in which only the vowels differ from the vowels of the Masoretic text, is indicated by purple asterisks on either side of the revocalization.

(Click diagram to enlarge)

This resource is in the process of reformatting. To view the notes on the Macrosyntax of Psalm 119, click here.

---

Speech Act Analysis

  What is Speech Act Analysis?

The Speech Act layer presents the text in terms of what it does, following the findings of Speech Act Theory. It builds on the recognition that there is more to communication than the exchange of propositions. Speech act analysis is particularly important when communicating cross-culturally, and lack of understanding can lead to serious misunderstandings, since the ways languages and cultures perform speech acts varies widely.

For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Speech Act Analysis Creator Guidelines.

Summary Visual

This resource is forthcoming.

---

Speech Act Chart

The following chart is scrollable (left/right; up/down).

  Legend

Verse	Hebrew	CBC	Sentence type	Illocution (general)	Illocution with context	Macro speech act	Intended perlocution (Think)	Intended perlocution (Feel)	Intended perlocution (Do)
Verse number and poetic line	Hebrew text	English translation	Declarative, Imperative, or Interrogative Indirect Speech Act: Mismatch between sentence type and illocution type	Assertive, Directive, Expressive, Commissive, or Declaratory Indirect Speech Act: Mismatch between sentence type and illocution type	More specific illocution type with paraphrased context	Illocutionary intent (i.e. communicative purpose) of larger sections of discourse These align with the "Speech Act Summary" headings	What the speaker intends for the address to think	What the speaker intends for the address to feel	What the speaker intends for the address to do

If an emendation or revocalization is preferred, that emendation or revocalization will be marked in the Hebrew text of all the visuals.

Emendations/Revocalizations legend
*Emended text*	Emended text, text in which the consonants differ from the consonants of the Masoretic text, is indicated by blue asterisks on either side of the emendation.
*Revocalized text*	Revocalized text, text in which only the vowels differ from the vowels of the Masoretic text, is indicated by purple asterisks on either side of the revocalization.

Emotional Analysis

  What is Emotional Analysis?

This layer explores the emotional dimension of the biblical text and seeks to uncover the clues within the text itself that are part of the communicative intent of its author. The goal of this analysis is to chart the basic emotional tone and/or progression of the psalm.

For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Emotional Analysis Creator Guidelines.

Emotional Analysis Chart

  Legend

If an emendation or revocalization is preferred, that emendation or revocalization will be marked in the Hebrew text of all the visuals.

Emendations/Revocalizations legend
*Emended text*	Emended text, text in which the consonants differ from the consonants of the Masoretic text, is indicated by blue asterisks on either side of the emendation.
*Revocalized text*	Revocalized text, text in which only the vowels differ from the vowels of the Masoretic text, is indicated by purple asterisks on either side of the revocalization.

Summary Visual

(Click visual to enlarge).

---

Bibliography

Allen, Leslie, C. 2002. Psalms 101-150. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.

Amir, Yehoshua. 1985. "Psalm 119 als Zeugnis eines protorabbinischen Judentums." In Yehoshua Amir (ed.) Studien zum Antiken Judentum. Frankfurt & New York: Peter Lang.

Atkinson, Ian. Forthcoming 2025. "Bipartite Verbless Clauses." In Geoffrey Khan (ed.) The Cambridge Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Cambridge: University of Cambridge & Open Book Publishers.

Auffret, P. 1993. Voyez de Voz Yeux: Étude Structurelle de Vingt Psaumes dont le Psaume 119. Leiden: Brill.

Auffret, P. 2006. Mais Tu Élargirais mon Cœur: Nouvelle Étude Structurelle du Psaume 119. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Barthélemy, Dominique. 2005. Critique Textuelle de l'Ancien Testament: Tome 4. Psaumes. Fribourg/Göttingen: Vandenhoeck Ruprecht.

BDB = Brown, Francis, Driver, Samuel R. & Briggs, Charles A. 1977. Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Beentjes, P. C. 1997. The Book of Ben Sira in Hebrew: A Text Edition of all Extant Hebrew Manuscripts and a Synopsis of all Parallel Hebrew Ben Sira Texts. Leiden: Brill.

BHRG = Van der Merwe, C. H. J., Naudé, J. A., Kroeze, J. H. 2017. A Biblical Hebrew Reference Grammar. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.

Bratcher, Robert G. & Reyburn, William, D. 1991. A Translator’s Handbook on the Book of Psalms, UBS Handbook Series. New York, NY: United Bible Societies.

Bridge, Edward, J. 2009. "Loyalty, Dependency and Status with YHWH: The Use of ʿbd in the Psalms." VT 59, no. 3: 360-378.

CAD = Roth, Martha, T (ed.). 1956-2010. The Assyrian Dictionary of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute.

CAL = Kaufman, Stephen A. (ed.). The Comprehensive Aramaic Lexicon.

CGL = Diggle, James (ed.). 2021. The Cambridge Greek Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Croft, W. 2022. Morphosyntax: Constructions of the World's Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

DCH = David J. A. Clines, David J. A. (ed). 1993-2011. The Dictionary of Classical Hebrew. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

DeClaisse-Walford, Nancy in DeClaisse-Walford, Nancy et al. 2014. The Book of Psalms. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Deissler, Alfons. 1955. Psalm 119 (118) und seine Theologie. Munich: Karl Zink Verlag.

De-Rossi, Giovanni B. 2012 (1784). Variae Lectiones Veteris Testamenti, Vol. IV. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.

Elwolde, John F. 1997. "Some Lexical Structures in 1QH: Towards a Distinction of the Linguistic and the Literary." Pages 77-116 in Takamitsu Muraoka & John F. Elwolde (eds.) Sirach, Scrolls, and Sages: Proceedings of a Second International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Ben Sira, and the Mishnah, Held at Leiden University, 15-17 December 1997. Leiden: Brill.

Eusebius von Caesarea, Werke Band X der Psalmenkommentar, Teil 3: Fragmente zu Psalm 101-150. Franz X. Risch (ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter, 2022.

Fassberg, Steven E. 2019. An Introduction to the Syntax of Biblical Hebrew (in Hebrew). Jerusalem: The Bialik Institute.

Firth, J. 2023. "The Suffering Servant in Book V of the Psalter." Pages 111-126 in Reading the Psalms Theologically. Edited by D. M. Howard Jr. & A. J. Schmutzer. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Academic Press.

Fokkelman, J. P. 2003. Major Poems of the Hebrew Bible: at the Interface of Prosody and Structural Analysis. Vol. III: The Remaining 65 Psalms. Assen: Royal van Gorcum, 235-270.

Freedman, David N. 1999. Psalm 119: The Exaltation of Torah. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.

Gesenius = Gesenius, W. Donner, H. Rüterswörden, U. Renz, J. Meyer, R. (eds.). 2013. Hebräisches und aramäisches Handwörterbuch über das Alte Testament. 18. Auflage Gesamtausgabe. Berlin: Springer.

GKC = Gesenius, Wilhelm & Kautsch, Emil. 1909. A. E. Cowley (trans.) Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Goldingay, John. 2008. Psalms 90-150. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

Grosser, Emmylou, J. 2023. Unparalleled Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ḥakham, Amos. 1979. ספר תהלים: ספרים ג–ה (in Hebrew; The Book of Psalms: Books 3-5). Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook.

HALOT = Ludwig Koehler, Ludwig & Baumgartner, Walter et al. 1994-2000. The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament. Leiden: Brill.

Hardy, H. H. II. 2022. The Development of Biblical Hebrew Prepositions. Atlanta, GA: SBL Press.

Harper's = E. A. Andrews, C. T. Lewis, C. Short. 1879. Harper's Latin Dictionary: A New Latin Dictionary Founded on the Translation of Freund's Latin-German Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hoftijzer, J, Jongeling, K 1995. Dictionary of the North-West Semitic Inscriptions. Leiden: Brill.

Hurvitz, Avi. 1972. בין לשון ללשון: לתולדות לשון המקרא בימי בית שני (in Hebrew; The Transition Period in Biblical Hebrew: A Study in Post-Exilic Hebrew and its Implications for the Dating of Psalms). Jerusalem: Bialik Institute.

________. 1988. Wisdom Vocabulary in the Hebrew Psalter: A Contribution to the Study of "Wisdom Psalms." VT 38, no. 1: 41-51.

Ibn Ezra, Abraham on Psalms.

James, E. T. 2022. "The Asethetics of Biblical Acrostics." Pages 319-339 in JSOT 46(3).

Jastrow, Marcus. 1903. A Dictionary of the Targumim, the Talmud Babli and Yerushalmi, and the Midrashic Literature. London: W.C. Luzac & Co.

Jenni, Ernst. 1992. Die Hebräischen Präpositionen Band 1: Die Präposition Beth. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.

________. 2000. Die Hebräischen Präpositionen Band 3: Die Präposition Lamed. Stuttgart: Verlag W. Kohlhammer.

Joüon, Paul & Muraoka, Takamitsu. 2006. A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Rome: Pontificio Istituto Biblico.

Keel, Othmar. 1997. The Symbolism of the Biblical World: Ancient Near Eastern Iconography and the Book of Psalms. Leiden: Brill.

Kim, Young Bok. 2022. Hebrew Forms of Address: A Sociolinguistic Analysis. PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago.

Kraus, H. J. 1989. Psalms 60-150: A Commentary (trans.) H. C. Oswald. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Lane, Edward, W. An Arabic-English Lexicon.

LSJ = Liddel, Henry G., Scott, R. & Jones, Henry, S. 1996. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Mays, J. L. 1987. "The Place of the Torah-Psalms in the Psalter." JBL 106, no, 1: 3-12.

Mena, Andrea, K. 2012. The Semantic Potential of עַל in Genesis, Psalms, and Chronicles. MA Thesis, University of Stellenbosch.

Miller, Cynthia. 2010. Vocative Syntax in Biblical Hebrew Prose and Poetry: A Preliminary Analysis. Semitic Studies 55, no.1: 347-364.

Muraoka, T. 2016. A Syntax of Septuagint Greek. Leuven: Peeters.

NIDOTTE = VanGemeren, Willem (ed.). 1997. New International Dictionary of Old Testament Theology & Exegesis. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.

Notarius, Tania & Atkinson, Ian. Forthcoming 2025. "Impersonal Constructions." In Geoffrey Khan (ed.) The Cambridge Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Cambridge: University of Cambridge & Open Book Publishers.

Del Olmo Lete, G, Sanmartín, J, Watson, W. G. E. (trans.) 2015. A Dictionary of the Ugaritic Language in the Alphabetic Tradition. Leiden: Brill.

Parry, Donald W., & Andrew C. Skinner eds., Dead Sea Scrolls Electronic Library Biblical Texts. In Consultation with Emanuel Tov and Eugene Ulrich. Leiden: Brill, 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2451-9383_dss.11q5.dsbo-eng2

Penney, Jason. 2023. A Typological Examination of the Pluractionality in the Biblical Hebrew Piel. MA Thesis, Dallas International University.

Procházková, Ivana. 2021. The Torah / Law is a Journey: Using Cognitive and Culturally Oriented Linguistics to Interpret and Translate Metaphors in the Hebrew Bible. Prague: Karolinum Press.

RADAK, Sefer HaShorashim.

Rashi (Yitzchaki, Shlomo) on Psalms.

Revell, Ernst J. 2004. A List of Pausal Forms in the TeNaK. The Pericope Group.

Reynolds, Kent. 2008. "The Answer of Psalm CXIX 9." VT 58, no. 2: 265-269.

________. 2010. Torah as Teacher: The Exemplary Torah Student in Psalm 119. Leiden: Brill.

Ringleben, Joachim. "Das Wort, Die Weg, und die Weisung: Systematische Analyse von Psalm 119." Kerygma und Dogma 65: 173-201.

SDBH = de Blois, Reinier (ed.). Semantic Dictionary of Biblical Hebrew. United Bible Societies.

Schipper, Bernd. U. 2014. “Egyptian Backgrounds to the Psalms.” Pages 57-75 in William P. Brown (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Psalms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sjörs, Ambjörn. 2018. Historical Aspects of Standard Negation in Semitic. Leiden: Brill.

________. Forthcoming 2025. "Infinitive Construct." In Geoffrey Khan (ed.) The Cambridge Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Cambridge: University of Cambridge & Open Book Publishers.

Sokoloff, Michael. 2009. A Syriac Lexicon: A Translation from the Latin, Correction, Expansion, and Update of C. Brockelmann's Lexicon Syriacum. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns & Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.

________. 2017. A Dictionary of Jewish Palestinian Aramaic of the Byzantine Period. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University Press.

Soll, Will. 1987. "The Question of Psalm 119:9." JBL 106, no. 4: 687-688.

________. 1991. Psalm 119: Matrix, Form and Setting. Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association of America.

Stec, David M. 2004. The Targum of Psalms: Translated, with a Critical Introduction, Apparatus, and Notes. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.

Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward A Cognitive Semantics: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Taylor, Richard A. in Bali, Joseph & George Kiraz (eds.). 2020. The Psalms According to the Syriac Peshitta Version with English Translation. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.

TDOT = Botterweck, G. Johannes & Ringgren, Helmer (eds.). 1978. Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament, Volume III. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Terrien, Samuel. 2003. The Psalms: Strophic Structure and Theological Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Tigay, Jeffrey H. 2017. "On the Tolerative/Permissive Hiph῾il." Pages 397-414 in F. E. Greenspahn & G. A. Rendsburg (eds.) Le-ma‘an Ziony: Essays in Honor of Ziony Zevit. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books.

TLOT = Jenni, Ernst & Westermann, Claus (eds.). 1997. Theological Lexicon of the Old Testament, Volumes I-III. Trans. Mark E. Biddle. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.

van der Lugt, P. 2013. Cantos and Strophes in Biblical Hebrew Poetry III: Psalms 90-150 and Psalm 1. Leiden: Brill.

van der Merwe, C. H. J. 2009. "Another Look at the Biblical Hebrew Focus Particle גַּם." JSS 54, no. 2: 313-332.

________. 2023. "The Conceptualization of Heart as an Active Zone Body Part in Biblical Hebrew." Pages 294-318 in Hanneke van Loon and Pierre van Hecke (eds.) Where Is the Way to the Dwelling of Light? Studies in Genesis, Job and Linguistics in Honor of Ellen van Wolde. Leiden: Brill.

VTH = Benjamin Kennicott (ed.). 1776. Vetus Testamentum Hebraicum: cum variis lectionibus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Warren-Rothlin, Andy. "Idioms: Biblical Hebrew." Pages 227-229 in Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics, Volume 2. Edited by G. Khan. Leiden: Brill.

Weitzman, M. P. 1999. The Syriac Version of the Old Testament: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Whybray, Roger. N. 1997. "Psalm 119: Profile of a Psalmist." Pages 31-43 in Wisdom, You are my Sister: Studies in Honor of Roland E. Murphy, O. Carm., on the Occasion of His Eightieth Birthday. The Catholic Biblical Quarterly Monograph Series. Washington, DC: Catholic Biblical Association. Edited by Michael L. Barré.

Zenger, Erich. 2011. A Commentary on Psalms 101-150. Linda M. Maloney (trans.). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Zernecke, Anna E. 2014. “Mesopotamian Parallels to the Psalms.” Pages 26-42 in William P. Brown (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Psalms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

---