Psalm 33 Discourse
From Psalms: Layer by Layer
Psalm 33/Discourse
Choose a Psalm Navigate Psalm 33
YHWH's Plan Stands Forever
Psalm 33
Please note: Resources for Psalm 33 are in the process of being reformatted for visual consistency and improved functionality.
About the Discourse Layer
Our Discourse Layer includes four additional layers of analysis:
- Participant analysis
- Macrosyntax
- Speech act analysis
- Emotional analysis
For more information on our method of analysis, click the expandable explanation button at the beginning of each layer.
Participant Analysis
Participant Analysis focuses on the characters in the psalm and asks, “Who are the main participants (or characters) in this psalm, and what are they saying or doing? It is often helpful for understanding literary structure, speaker identification, etc.
For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Participant Analysis Creator Guidelines.
Participant Relations Diagram
The relationships among the participants may be abstracted and summarized as follows:
Participant Analysis Summary Distribution
This resource is forthcoming.
Macrosyntax
The macrosyntax layer rests on the belief that human communicators desire their addressees to receive a coherent picture of their message and will cooperatively provide clues to lead the addressee into a correct understanding. So, in the case of macrosyntax of the Psalms, the psalmist has explicitly left syntactic clues for the reader regarding the discourse structure of the entire psalm. Here we aim to account for the function of these elements, including the identification of conjunctions which either coordinate or subordinate entire clauses (as the analysis of coordinated individual phrases is carried out at the phrase-level semantics layer), vocatives, other discourse markers, direct speech, and clausal word order.
For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Macrosyntax Creator Guidelines.
Macrosyntax Diagram
| Macrosyntax legend | |
|---|---|
| Vocatives | Vocatives are indicated by purple text. |
| Discourse marker | Discourse markers (such as כִּי, הִנֵּה, לָכֵן) are indicated by orange text. |
 |
The scope governed by the discourse marker is indicated by a dashed orange bracket connecting the discourse marker to its scope. |
 |
The preceding discourse grounding the discourse marker is indicated by a solid orange bracket encompassing the relevant clauses. |
| Subordinating conjunction | The subordinating conjunction is indicated by teal text. |
 |
Subordination is indicated by a solid teal bracket connecting the subordinating conjunction with the clause to which it is subordinate. |
| Coordinating conjunction | The coordinating conjunction is indicated by blue text. |
 |
Coordination is indicated by a solid blue line connecting the coordinating clauses. |
 |
Coordination without an explicit conjunction is indicated by a dashed blue line connecting the coordinated clauses. |
 |
Marked topic is indicated by a black dashed rounded rectangle around the marked words. |
 |
The scope of the activated topic is indicated by a black dashed bracket encompassing the relevant clauses. |
| Marked focus or thetic sentence | Marked focus (if one constituent) or thetic sentences[1] are indicated by bold text. |
 |
Frame setters[2] are indicated by a solid gray rounded rectangle around the marked words. |
| [blank line] | Discourse discontinuity is indicated by a blank line. |
| [indentation] | Syntactic subordination is indicated by indentation. |
 |
Direct speech is indicated by a solid black rectangle surrounding all relevant clauses. |
| (text to elucidate the meaning of the macrosyntactic structures) | Within the CBC, any text elucidating the meaning of macrosyntax is indicated in gray text inside parentheses. |
If an emendation or revocalization is preferred, that emendation or revocalization will be marked in the Hebrew text of all the visuals.
| Emendations/Revocalizations legend | |
|---|---|
| *Emended text* | Emended text, text in which the consonants differ from the consonants of the Masoretic text, is indicated by blue asterisks on either side of the emendation. |
| *Revocalized text* | Revocalized text, text in which only the vowels differ from the vowels of the Masoretic text, is indicated by purple asterisks on either side of the revocalization. |
(Click diagram to enlarge)
This resource is in the process of reformatting. To view the notes on the Macrosyntax of Psalm 33, click here.
Speech Act Analysis
The Speech Act layer presents the text in terms of what it does, following the findings of Speech Act Theory. It builds on the recognition that there is more to communication than the exchange of propositions. Speech act analysis is particularly important when communicating cross-culturally, and lack of understanding can lead to serious misunderstandings, since the ways languages and cultures perform speech acts varies widely.
For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Speech Act Analysis Creator Guidelines.
Summary Visual
This resource is forthcoming.
Speech Act Chart
The following chart is scrollable (left/right; up/down).
| Verse | Hebrew | CBC | Sentence type | Illocution (general) | Illocution with context | Macro speech act | Intended perlocution (Think) | Intended perlocution (Feel) | Intended perlocution (Do) |
| Verse number and poetic line | Hebrew text | English translation | Declarative, Imperative, or Interrogative Indirect Speech Act: Mismatch between sentence type and illocution type |
Assertive, Directive, Expressive, Commissive, or Declaratory Indirect Speech Act: Mismatch between sentence type and illocution type |
More specific illocution type with paraphrased context | Illocutionary intent (i.e. communicative purpose) of larger sections of discourse These align with the "Speech Act Summary" headings |
What the speaker intends for the address to think | What the speaker intends for the address to feel | What the speaker intends for the address to do |
If an emendation or revocalization is preferred, that emendation or revocalization will be marked in the Hebrew text of all the visuals.
| Emendations/Revocalizations legend | |
|---|---|
| *Emended text* | Emended text, text in which the consonants differ from the consonants of the Masoretic text, is indicated by blue asterisks on either side of the emendation. |
| *Revocalized text* | Revocalized text, text in which only the vowels differ from the vowels of the Masoretic text, is indicated by purple asterisks on either side of the revocalization. |
Emotional Analysis
This layer explores the emotional dimension of the biblical text and seeks to uncover the clues within the text itself that are part of the communicative intent of its author. The goal of this analysis is to chart the basic emotional tone and/or progression of the psalm.
For a detailed explanation of our method, see the Emotional Analysis Creator Guidelines.
Emotional Analysis Chart
If an emendation or revocalization is preferred, that emendation or revocalization will be marked in the Hebrew text of all the visuals.
| Emendations/Revocalizations legend | |
|---|---|
| *Emended text* | Emended text, text in which the consonants differ from the consonants of the Masoretic text, is indicated by blue asterisks on either side of the emendation. |
| *Revocalized text* | Revocalized text, text in which only the vowels differ from the vowels of the Masoretic text, is indicated by purple asterisks on either side of the revocalization. |
Summary Visual
(Click visual to enlarge).
Bibliography
- Aejmelaeus, Anneli. 1986. “Function and Interpretation of כי in Biblical Hebrew.” JBL 105: 193–209.
- ________. 1993. On the Trail of Septuagint Translators: Collected Essays. Kampen: Kok Pharos Pub. House.
- Anderson, A. A. 1972. The Book of Psalms Volume 1: Psalms 1-72. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
- Auffret, Pierre. 2009. "'Rendez Grace a YHWH Avec La Harpe': Etude Structurelle Du Psaume 33." Estudios Bíblicos 67: 85–100.
- Baethgen, Friedrich. 1904. Die Psalmen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
- Bekins, Peter. 2014. "Object Marking in Biblical Hebrew Poetry." SBLSPS 53. San Diego: Society of Biblical Literature.
- Berlin, Adele. 2007. The Dynamics of Biblical Parallelism. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
- Blau, Joshua. 1976. A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.
- Boda, Mark J. 2010. 1-2 Chronicles. Cornerstone Biblical Commentary 5. Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.
- Bratcher, Robert G., and William D. Reyburn. 1991. A Handbook on Psalms. UBS Handbook Series. New York: United Bible Societies.
- Briggs, Charles A., and Emilie Grace Briggs. 1906. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Book of Psalms. ICC. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.
- Calvin, John. 1965. A Commentary on the Psalms. Edited by T.H.L. Parker. Translated by Arthur Golding. Vol. 1. London: Camelot Press.
- Craigie, Peter C. 1983. Psalms 1–50. WBC 19. Dallas: Word.
- Dahood, Mitchell. 1966. Psalms I: 1-50. AB. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
- ________. 1966. “Vocative Lamedh in the Psalter.” VT 16, no. 3: 299–311.
- deClaissé-Walford, Nancy, Rolf A. Jacobson, and Beth LaNeel Tanner. 2014. The Book of Psalms. NICOT. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
- Deissler, Alfons. 1956. “Der Anthologische Charakter des Psalmes 33 (32).” Pages 225–33 in Mélanges Bibliques: Rédigés en L’Honneur de Andre Robert. Edited by Pierre Casetti et al. Paris: Bloud & Gay.
- Duhm, Bernhard. 1899. Die Psalmen. Kurzer Hand-Commentar Zum Alten Testament 14. Leipzig und Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
- Fokkelman, J.P. 2000. Major Poems of the Hebrew Bible: At the Interface of Prosody and Structural Analysis (Vol 2: 85 Psalms and Job 4–14). Vol. 2. Assen: Van Gorcum.
- Garr, W. Randall. 2004. “ןה.” Revue Biblique 111:321–44.
- Hallo, William W., and K. Lawson Younger, eds. 2003. The Context of Scripture: Canonical Compositions from the Biblical World. Vol. 1. Leiden ; Boston: Brill.
- Hallo, William W., and K. Lawson Younger, eds. 2000. The Context of Scripture: Monumental Inscriptions from the Biblical World. Vol. 2. Leiden ; Boston: Brill.
- Hendel, Ronald S. 1996. In the Margins of the Hebrew Verbal System: Situation, Tense, Aspect, Mood. Zeitschrift Für Althebraistik 9: 152–81.
- Huehnergard, John. 1983. “Asseverative *la and Hypothetical *lu/Law in Semitic.” Journal of the American Oriental Society, 103, no. 3: 569–93.
- Humbert, Paul. 1946. La Terou’a: Analyse d’un Rite Biblique. Neuchatel: Université de Neuchatel.
- Hupfeld, Hermann. 1868. Die Psalmen. Vol. 2. Gotha: Friedrich Andreas Perthes.
- Janzen, Waldemar. 1965. “’Ašrê in the Old Testament.” Harvard Theological Review 58:215–26.
- Keel, Othmar. 1997. The Symbolism of the Biblical World: Ancient Near Eastern Iconography and the Book of Psalms. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
- Keil, Carl Friedrich, and Franz Delitzsch. 1996. Commentary on the Old Testament. Peabody: Hendrickson.
- Kennicott, Benjamin. 1775. Vetus Testamentum Hebraicum Cum Variis Lectionibus. Oxford:Clarendon Press.
- Kim, Young Bok. 2023. “Hebrew Forms of Address: A Sociolinguistic Analysis.” Atlanta: SBL Press.
- Kirkpatrick, A. F., ed. 1902. The Book of Psalms. London: Cambridge University Press.
- Kittel, Rudolf. 1922. Die Psalmen. Leipzig: A. Deichertsche Verlagsbuchhandlung Dr. Werner Scholl.
- Kolyada, Yelena. 2013. A Compendium of Musical Instruments and Instrumental Terminology in the Bible. Translated by Yelena Kolyada and David Clark. Abingdon: Routledge.
- König, Ekkehard, and Peter Siemund. 2007. “Speech Act Distinctions in Grammar.” Pages 276–324 in Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Edited by Timothy Shopen. Vol. 1 of 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kraus, Hans-Joachim. 1988. Psalms 1-59: A Commentary. Minneapolis: Augsburg.
- Kugel, James L. 1981. The Idea of Biblical Poetry: Parallelism and Its History. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Labuschagne, C.J. 2020 “Numerical Features of the Psalms, a Logotechnical Quantitative Structural Analysis.” DataverseNL.
- Locatell, Christian. 2017. “Grammatical Polysemy in the Hebrew Bible: A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to כי.” PhD Dissertation, University of Stellenbosch.
- Locatell, Christian. 2019. “Causal Categories in Biblical Hebrew Discourse: A Cognitive Approach to Causal כי.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 45, no. 2: 79–102.
- Lugt, Pieter van der. 2006. Cantos and Strophes in Biblical Hebrew Poetry: With Special Reference to the First Book of the Psalter. Vol. 1. Oudtestamentische Studiën 53. Leiden: Brill.
- Merrill, Eugene H. 2015. A Commentary on 1 & 2 Chronicles. Kregel Exegetical Library. Grand Rapids: Kregel Academic.
- Miller-Naudé, Cynthia L. 2010. “Vocative Syntax in Biblical Hebrew Prose and Poetry: A Preliminary Analysis.” Journal of Northwest Semitic Languages 36, no. 1: 43–64.
- Murray, Sarah. 2014. “Varieties of Update.” Semantics and Pragmatics 7:1–53.
- Muraoka, Takamitsu. 1985. Emphatic Words and Structures in Biblical Hebrew. Leiden: Brill.
- Niccacci, Alviero. 2006. “The Biblical Hebrew Verbal System in Poetry.” Pages 247–68 in Biblical Hebrew in Its Northwest Semitic Setting: Typological and Historical Perspectives. Edited by Steven E. Fassberg and Avi Hurvitz. Jerusalem: Hebrew University Magnes Press.
- O’Connor, Michael Patrick. 1980. Hebrew Verse Structure. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
- Podechard, Emmanuel. 1949. Le Psautier: notes critiques: Psaumes 1-75. Vol. 1. Bibliotèque de la Faculté Catholique de Théologie du Lyon 4. Lyon: Facultés Catholiques.
- Ross, Allen P. 2001. Introducing Biblical Hebrew. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
- ________. 2011. A Commentary on the Psalms, Volume 1: 1-41. Kregel Exegetical Library. Grand Rapids: Kregel Academic.
- Ryken, Leland, Jim Wilhoit, Tremper Longman, Colin Duriez, Douglas Penney, and Daniel G. Reid, eds. 1998. Dictionary of Biblical Imagery. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
- Stec, David M., ed. 2004. The Targum of Psalms. The Aramaic Bible 16. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.
- Strickman, H. Norman. 2009. Rabbi Abraham Ibn Ezra's Commentary on the First Book of Psalms. Boston: Academic Studies Press.
- Suderman, W. Derek. May 2015. “The Vocative Lamed and Shifting Address in the Psalms: Reevaluating Dahood’s Proposal.” VT 65, no. 2: 297–312.
- Tate, Marvin E. 1998. Psalms 51–100. WBC 20. Dallas: Word.
- Taylor, Richard A. 2020. The Syriac Peshitta Bible with English Translation. Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press.
- Vincent, Jean Marcel. 1978. “Recherches Exégétiques Sur Le Psaume 33.” VT 28: 442–54.
- Witte, Markus. 2002. “Das Neue Lied--Beobachtungen Zum Zeitverständnis von Psalm 33” ZAW 114: 522–41.
- Ziegert, Carsten. 2020. “What Is חֶ֫סֶד? A Frame-Semantic Approach.” JSOT 44: 711–32.
Footnotes
- ↑ When the entire utterance is new/unexpected, it is a thetic sentence (often called "sentence focus"). See our Creator Guidelines for more information on topic and focus.
- ↑ Frame setters are any orientational constituent – typically, but not limited to, spatio-temporal adverbials – function to "limit the applicability of the main predication to a certain restricted domain" and "indicate the general type of information that can be given" in the clause nucleus (Krifka & Musan 2012: 31-32). In previous scholarship, they have been referred to as contextualizing constituents (see, e.g., Buth (1994), “Contextualizing Constituents as Topic, Non-Sequential Background and Dramatic Pause: Hebrew and Aramaic evidence,” in E. Engberg-Pedersen, L. Falster Jakobsen and L. Schack Rasmussen (eds.) Function and expression in Functional Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 215-231; Buth (2023), “Functional Grammar and the Pragmatics of Information Structure for Biblical Languages,” in W. A. Ross & E. Robar (eds.) Linguistic Theory and the Biblical Text. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers, 67-116), but this has been conflated with the function of topic. In brief: sentence topics, belonging to the clause nucleus, are the entity or event about which the clause provides a new predication; frame setters do not belong in the clause nucleus and rather provide a contextual orientation by which to understand the following clause.